notations / eleventh lecture / July 9th / 2018

now
we have to spend
a little while with
the question of
intension
–
is it promise
or something
we think we have to fulfill?
is it bent on
to create a better world
or on an object
(maybe also an attribute)
we want to possess?
–
or is it all of this
in once?
–
to bring ourselves closer
to a clarification
first we have to analyze
the respective structure
(which – by the way –
is the structure in general)

Featured

horizontal lines

1
the horizontal
lines of the linear time flow
which we describe as
„finiteness“

vertical lines

2
the vertical
lines of the ideational time
which we describe as
„immortality“

curved lines

3a
the curved
lines of the circling time
which we describe as
„remembrance“

interwoven horizontal and vertical lines

4
the interwoven
horizontal and vertical
lines of the rhizomorph time
leaps
which we describe as
„narrative“

5
in order to achieve
immortality
the finite time
– moving in horizontal
direction –
must be adapted to a goal
which exceeds
the horizon
to an infinite vertical

build by the lines between coordinates

6
actually
the respective space
of our reality is
build by the lines between
coordinates
(according Jean-Luc Nancy
the only thing
we can call the truth)
which do not own
any horizontal or vertical
orientation

the rhizomorph structured topologies

7a
we need the linear time flow
to write and read
the rhizomorph structured
topologies
of what can be read as the text
of our narration

writing and reading

8a
writing and reading
means
the way we perceive ourselves
/ in between the coordinates
/ hold by the coordinates
/ creating with our movements
the lines
of the horizontal
or vertical orientation

creating whatever

9a
writing and reading
(or in other words:
creating whatever) is
the way we try
to let our intentions
become real

making something readable

10a
writing is based
on the functionality of
making something readable
and vice versa
–
so
functionality
is the tool to realize
an intention
within the linear time flow

10b

10c

functionality seems to be immortal per se

11a
functionality does not possess
any volume
–
so
functionality for itself is
/ beyond living or dying
/ beyond the linear time flow
or the rhizomorph time leaps
–
so
functionality seems to be
immortal per se

11b

let an intention become real

12a
the difference between
/ funktion and
/ grammar
–
we can say:
grammar is the general valid
programm in order to
let an intention become real
–
functionality
is the variable usage

12b

12c

12d

Tomaso Carnetto18 July 2018