1
there are three fields
(interconnected)
we have to be aware of
in terms of any kind of designing
(it may be so called artistic work
or in terms of
scientific or social design)
–
1st the field of grammar
(which we talked about a lot)
–
2nd the field of volume
(we can’t talk about it without
the knowledge of grammar)
2
if we combine these fields
by directing the respective elements
of each field
to achieve a valid composition
(of whatever kind)
involuntarily the text
/ narration
/ notations
/ participation
of what is (i.e. of the whole web / texture)
will occur
3
now let's take a closer look at the field of
/ intentions
/ relations
/ individual and common history
–
obviously our intension is focussed
on social intercourse
(or to say it
from the perspective of designing
there is a very natural desire
of every author / artist
/ and so on
to be published
which has nothing to do with success
fame or status
it is much more about
being a part of the whole texture
by the text you have knotted)
4
if you repeat the process
of creating intersections
by following the lines (which are
building intersections
by their way from point to point)
by freehanded drawing
knots / which are creating an
inextricable web / will be the result
–
so we can say
that the World Wide Web is an access
to the two-dimensional surface
of the multi-layered texture
of our the presence and remembrance
of our staging /
for years we have seen how the Web
will be adapted
to the paradigm of a functionality
that rules itself
5.1
the functionalization
of the www
is a strategy that is very easy
to observe
it does not operate primarily
with external restrictions
but much more with
the pressure of inner values
of social intercourse
–
„In order to engage in
social intercourse
one must identify the other individual
to be significant.“
5.2
–
significance is a value
that results from competition
be more significant
means to be more successful
–
but success – in what way?
be significant!
but what is the function of
being significant?
significant as a prototype!
6
we have only one possibility
of being immortal
by becoming an ideal signifier /
that means
a more or less perfect prototype
of power
/ beauty
/ health
= social success / status
= prototypical significance of functionality
7
let’s start
with the pressure of functionality
(or come back to it)
in which everyone has
its undeniable position
/ name
/ task
(in relation to the ideal signifier
/ perfect prototype)
and our desire is to find out the
/ the meaning of that
to which we are forced
/ to do
/ to be
8
by this let’s start
to think about intercourse
that we assume
this kind of acting is
beyond all functions
but in fact it’s
the core of it
–
I would say
in the way we use to do it
/ just do it
by being plugged in
(into some kind of a point zero)
we are constructing
invisible threads
around ourselves to ensure
our position
within the Euclidean grid
of functionality
9.1
every time by conquering
/ capturing
/ seducing the one which
we pretend to love
we fulfill the core of function:
stay away from
weakness and loneliness!
proof to be
/ strong
/ beautiful
/ healthy
to say it simple:
to be the best choice
so we have to decide
/ how to stick ourself
into ourselves
10.1
so we see
how social and any other kind
of intercourses are deeply interwoven
/ 1500, „acquaintance by frequent
or customary intercourse“
from converse (v.).
/ 1610s as „conversation, familiar discourse“
/ 1749, „intimate intercourse, fellowship“
from inter- „between“
„communion“ / „converse“
/ 1771 a euphemistic shortening of
sexual intercourse with
/ intercourse in its sense
„social contact and relations“
–
so we can say
to become significant we have
to take our course
11.1
significant
in the sense
I am here in relation
to you /
seen from the position
of the self (i.e. the position of designing) /
of what we both are
in relation to ourselves
12.1
your significance
is not bounded
on any prototypical functionality
of being significant
but only on your will and ability
to move by yourself
in order to create the composition
of our common texture
/ the topological itself
by writing / reading
your own text
